Tuesday, October 12, 2021

Annotated bibliography writing website usa

Annotated bibliography writing website usa

annotated bibliography writing website usa

Oct 06,  · Write the annotated bibliography of the three given articles. From the article: Need to answer of those question. o Article 1: Find one article that discusses your selected health topic – define the topic, provide risk factors, justify why it is an important public health issue, research, etc. o Article 2: Find one article that discuss evidence-based prevention/management strategies tackling Writing college papers can also take up a lot of your time and with the many distractions Best Annotated Bibliography Ghostwriting Websites Usa and other tasks Best Annotated Bibliography Ghostwriting Websites Usa assigned to you, it can be so hard to ensure that the paper you are writing will still come out as a good quality paper Week 2 Writing Assignment: Informative Paper Annotated Bibliography New Attempt Due Sep 5 by pm Points 75 Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload This week, you will submit an annotated bibliography. Your annotated bibliography consists of four annotated sources; two for each side of the debatable





o Article 1: Find one article that discusses your selected health topic — define the topic, provide risk factors, justify why it is an important public health issue, research, etc. o Article 3: Find one article that discusses specific interventions that have been implemented to tackle your health issue and population of interest. Response Is Not Prevention: Management Insights for Reducing Campus Sexual. Universities use formal policies not only to respond to incidents of sexual harassment and sexual assault, but also to prevent future incidents.


Annotated bibliography writing website usa article integrates an analysis of the legal evolution of campus policies regarding sexual harassment and sexual assault in the U. and Canada with a targeted review of relevant topics within the management and organizations literature. Based on this synthesis of research examining organizational diversity initiatives, organizational culture, culture change, and safety culture, we challenge the perspective that university policies are an appropriate tool for sexual harassment and sexual assault prevention.


Achieving both goals — responsiveness and prevention — requires distinct approaches. Towards this end, we propose a hybrid strategy that requires the separation of policies designed to respond to incidents ex post, from approaches seeking to prevent further incidents ex ante.


Successful prevention requires culture change, and culture change requires a broader range of integrated efforts — organized around an encompassing goal such as mutual respect — than is practical to codify within sexual harassment or sexual assault policies.


Candidate in the Faculty of Law, annotated bibliography writing website usa, McGill University. Campus sexual harassment and sexual assault are enduring and pervasive problems facing universities.


issue is the development of university policies designed specifically to address sexual harassment and sexual assault. and procedures by which a university and its members respond to an incident of sexual harassment or sexual assault ex post. for university responses to incidents of harassment or assault, such policies are often viewed as contributing to the prevention of further incidents of harassment or assault.


This article brings in scholarship from management literature — concerning organizational diversity initiatives, organizational culture, culture change, and safety culture — to challenge the perspective that university policies are an appropriate tool for sexual harassment and sexual assault prevention.


Some elements that are important for policies regarding responses to such incidents are the same elements that render the policies impotent for campus culture change. For example, policies commonly define the types of behaviours to be prevented and focus on organizational responses to these behaviors when they occur. Although wholly sensible for responsive policies, this narrow focus is inconsistent with prevention.


Prevention requires identifying antecedents and precursors, and intervening in a more comprehensive manner. To illustrate the distinction between response-oriented and prevention- oriented policies, consider the case of serious sexually transmitted infections STIs such as syphilis.


In the event of evidence of new cases of an STI, public health organizations have response protocols with the goal of both containing the outbreak and ensuring the proper treatment of affected individuals. These response protocols are narrow, specific, and triggered episodically in the event of. protocols, and are more broad, varied, and encompassing. A broad range of education, screening, service provision, media campaigns, and the provision of barrier technologies e.


and hygiene efforts such as those dealing with planned pregnancy. Both response and prevention efforts are necessary and complement each other, but their associated scopes of activity are quite different.


Expecting the STI-response protocol to also yield effective prevention outcomes would be folly. The dominant single-policy-based approach to reducing campus sexual harassment and sexual assault resembles an attempt to do so using only response-based policies. After presenting the fundamental contradictions within policies created in response to sexual harassment and sexual assault and approaches that can help to prevent the same, we present an argument for using a hybrid strategy.


A hybrid strategy relieves policies designed to respond to incidents ex post from the burden of also preventing further incidents ex ante. As the management literature illustrates, successful prevention requires culture change, and culture change requires a broader range of integrated efforts than is practical to codify within sexual harassment or sexual assault strategies.


Canadian campus sexual assault policies have been influenced by the North American legal and social contexts involving not only universities, but also workplaces and public institutions. workplaces, sexual harassment policies have been highly influenced by a small number of legal cases. The Faragher. help separate organizational liability for incidents of sexual harassment from employee liability.


Organizations that develop and disseminate a sexual harassment policy may not be liable for harassment that takes place among. Friedman, Rachel E. Kachur, Seth M. define specifically what elements annotated bibliography writing website usa required in a sexual harassment policy for the liability protections established in Faragher.


Clark identified the following four elements: 1 a requirement that supervisors report incidents of sexual harassment; 2 the creation of both informal and formal avenues for reporting incidents of sexual harassment; 3 a method for bypassing a supervisor when reporting harassment; and 4 a requirement to provide training about the sexual harassment policy itself to employees. For workplaces, an important goal of sexual harassment policies is to protect the organization annotated bibliography writing website usa liability.


The procedures are what the organization needs annotated bibliography writing website usa do following an event, and the training and education requirement is not about harassment itself, but about the policy.


There is no clear prevention element in sexual harassment policies. Importantly, this history underlying U. workplace sexual harassment policies is reflected in university sexual harassment policies. In their study of online sexual harassment policy information annotated bibliography writing website usa U.


universities, Fusilier and Penrod. policies, each of the four elements specified in the Clark decision could be found in a majority of the policies examined. The fourth element in Clark is training, annotated bibliography writing website usa, and specifically, training about the policy itself.


Universities often provide a wider range of sexual harassment- related training with the hope and goal that such training may play a role in preventing future events.


However, that goal differs from the original intent for a training element in sexual harassment policies, and both theoretical and empirical evidence described below challenges the idea that training is an effective tool for preventing sexual harassment or sexual assault. Fusilier and Penrod found that 72 per cent of American not-for-profit universities with sexual harassment policies accessible online also mentioned training activities related to the policy, annotated bibliography writing website usa.


Although both the legal and university contexts highlighted so far are within the United States, we have observed similar tendencies in Canada. In our study of sexual harassment and sexual assault policies across Canadian universities.


Although Canadian universities have a legal context distinct from U. universities, both the international nature of higher education and the particular interdependencies between the U. and Canada mean that conformity pressures.


Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Partnership Grant Number: Project Director, Shaheen Shariff, PhD. Some information available at «www.


regarding policy and practice span the political border. For example, Canadian universities and U. universities often share the same accreditation bodies for their professional schools. The American Bar Association accredits U. and Canadian law schools, the Liaison Committee on Medical Education accredits U. and Canadian medical schools, Engineers Canada has a bilateral mutual recognition agreement with the U. Most of these organizations include explicit statements regarding the responsibility of members to provide safe and inclusive learning environments.


Beyond sharing similar laws. universities share a variety of formal institutional interdependencies and informal expectations from shared constituencies that prompt similarities in their policies and practices. Although these forces promote similarities in university policies and practices between Canada and the U. Whereas the U. federal government issued Title IX mandating academic institutions to ensure no student is discriminated against on the basis of sex, including addressing sexual violence, no such power to do so exists in Canada.


In the Canadian context, education falls squarely within provincial powers. many universities may have individual policies to address sexual violence among the campus community, most provincial governments — with the notable exception of Ontario — at this point in time do not typically require universities to have and enforce annotated bibliography writing website usa to this effect. Instead, a set of legal decisions based upon the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms have shaped and influenced policy decisions in Canadian universities.


We contend that this responsibility should likewise extend to all educational institutions including universities. Annotated bibliography writing website usa of the focus in fulfilling this obligation has been directed toward providing opportunities for complainants to have reasonable recourse.


But the trends in annotated bibliography writing website usa legal decisions and university practice have been towards more expansive and encompassing interpretations of the range of behaviours required to provide a safe and poison-free learning.


and the Canadian Human Rights Act, R. H-6,and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act,being Schedule Annotated bibliography writing website usa to the Canada Act U. New Brunswick School District No, annotated bibliography writing website usa. Dutton, CarswellBCBCHRT 56, 36 C. Human Rights Trib.


These trends point to the growing importance of prevention considerations, even though there has been little guidance as to the activities that are likely to successfully prevent the emergence of a poisoned environment. Ross was a high school teacher who distributed anti-Semitic material outside his classroom hours.


After the school board dismissed Ross, he brought a Charter challenge against their decision asserting that the board inadvertently infringed his right to free speech. Mpega v. and the educational institution is within its rights to discipline conduct reasonably — even if off campus — if that conduct will result in a harmful environment for students.


University obligations towards creating a poison-free environment were expanded in the contexts of online harassment, off-campus harassment, and off- campus sexual assault perpetrated by other students in the Zhang. and Mpega cases. In Mpega, when the university instituted disciplinary measures for a sexual assault committed off-campus by Mpega, a student, annotated bibliography writing website usa, Mpega sued the school arguing: 1 that the school could not discipline him for off-campus conduct; and 2 that the conduct in question did not fall within the definition of sexual harassment stipulated in the policy.


The school policy on student conduct explicitly applied to conduct off-campus and will apply to all members of the university community for the purpose of creating a safe learning environment free of harassment and sexual assault. Université de Moncton, CarswellNBCarswellNBNBCA 78, annotated bibliography writing website usa Admin.


Mpega is discussed further below. University of Western Ontario, CarswellOntONSCD. Jubran, annotated bibliography writing website usa, CarswellBCBCCAD. These cases demonstrate that for the purpose of creating a poison-free environment, annotated bibliography writing website usa, universities must consider external and remote threats, in addition to infractions taking place on campus.


Does this requirement also entail obligations for universities to adopt and enact preventative measures to cultivate and protect a poison-free environment?




ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY - APA FORMAT -

, time: 14:49






annotated bibliography writing website usa

Oct 06,  · Creating Your Research Question At the end of this course, you will create an “Annotated Bibliography” Final Paper on a topic within your major field of study. This week, you will begin the research process by defining an information need (selecting a topic and forming a research question for your “Annotated Bibliography”). Choose an interesting topic from an area related to your major An annotated webliography is very similar to an annotated bibliography which you completed in Week 4 of this course. Instead of reviewing and analyzing books and articles, this assignment requires students to review websites pertaining to a particular topic. Each website description will follow a similar format Home › Forums › Hermazing Hangout › professional annotated bibliography writing website usa This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 3 years ago by Keganfaw. Viewing 1 post (of 1 total) Author Posts September 17, at am # Reply KeganfawGuest Walker Oliver from Paterson was looking for [i]professional annotated

No comments:

Post a Comment